YAU MOU GAU...CHOR!! (有冇搞..错!!): June 2006

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Enough Dr M??? YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!!!


PETALING JAYA: Cabinet ministers and Mentris Besar expressed regret over Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's association with the Opposition and urged the former prime minister to cease his attacks on the Government.

In expressing their support for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, they questioned Dr Mahathir’s loyalty to Umno in the wake of his no-holds barred outburst in the media.

They said the former prime minister’s remarks were callous and could be used by the Opposition to weaken the Government and confuse the people.



They pleaded with Dr Mahathir to refrain from carrying out the open attacks on the Government for the good of Umno and the country and added that he was only tarnishing his own image by his actions.

In response, Dr Mahathir denied colluding with the Opposition and declared that he would not leave Umno as suggested by Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.

Nazri has no right to make demand, says Mahathir

KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz has no right to demand that a member leaves Umno because the party does not belong to him, says Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Describing Nazri as a “hatchet man among henchmen,” the former prime minister and ex-Umno president told a press conference yesterday: “I don’t care at all for his opinion.

“Umno does not belong to Datuk Nazri. The party belongs to all Malays. Nazri has no right on his own to demand that this person or that person leaves the party. I was in Umno before he was even born.”

On Monday, Nazri, who is a minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, declared “open war” on Dr Mahathir, demanding that he quit the party because he had colluded with the Opposition and was constantly attacking the Government.

Dr Mahathir stressed that he had never worked with the Opposition, he would not leave Umno and, as far as he was concerned, “criticising the Government is not war.”

“You mean you can’t criticise the Prime Minister at all? The amount of criticism I faced (as prime minister) will fill several volumes,” he said.

He clarified that PAS representatives were present at the forum where he spoke, but he did not at any time share a platform with the Opposition.

He took note of the fact that newspapers had shown a picture of him smiling at members of the opposition party, adding that “I smiled at a lot of people but those pictures were not shown.”

Dr Mahathir believed this was all part of a process to “demonise” him and make Umno members hate him so that the party could expel him.

“They are building up the tempo. If they can build hatred towards me fast enough, they’ll do it soon enough. But if I’m still popular among the Umno rank and file, I don’t think they’ll do it (sack me),” he said.

Dr Mahathir said he had nothing to gain from the criticisms he made against the Government, and he had no ambition to return to politics, not even as a Member of Parliament.

The former premier said he was merely “sticking his neck out” because many people had approached him “to do something about the situation in the country,” as they had been “feeling the pinch.”

“I also see wrong things being done and it is my duty (to speak up). Lots of people are not angry with me. In fact they come and see me and tell me, ‘Go on, Tun. We can’t do it’,” he added.

Sunday, June 25, 2006

AP issue explanation by Rafidah??? YAU MOU GAU...CHOR!!!

Watch by yourself!

Youtube AP issue

Sunday, June 18, 2006

The people behind Gerbang Perdana


MALAYSIA TODAY SPECIAL REPORT ON GERBANG PERDANA SDN BHD

Raja Petra Kamarudin

(1) Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd, the Johor-Singapore ‘Crooked’ Bridge or ‘Half-Bridge’ contractor, is 20% owned by (2) DRB-HICOM Berhad (3,680,000 shares), 20% owned by (3) Detik Nagasari Sdn Bhd (3,680,000 shares), and 60% owned by (4) Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd (11,040,000 shares).

(3) Detik Nagasari Sdn Bhd is 100% owned by (5) Hyundai-Sime Darby Berhad (Change of name from Transwater Bina Sdn Bhd to Transwater Corporation Sdn Bhd on 03.04.1986, and to Transwater Corporation Berhad and to Hyundai Berjaya Corporation Berhad on 21.07.2003, and to Hyundai-Sime Darby Berhad on 26.04.2005).

(4) Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd is 50% owned by (6) Ibex Corporation Amalgamated Sdn Bhd and 50% owned by (7) Ibzi Holdings Sdn Bhd.

(5) Hyundai-Sime Darby Berhad is 46.6% owned by Tan Sri Dato' Seri Vincent Tan Chee Yioun, 10.62% owned by Dato' Dr Tengku Retwan bin Tengku Mansor, 6.32% owned by Datuk Tengku Adnan bin Tengku Mansor, and 5.85% owned by The Estate of Dato' Wan Adli bin Dato' Wan Ibrahim (see full list below).

(6) Ibex Corporation Amalgamated Sdn Bhd (suspected to be the nominee company of the previous Menteri Besar of Johor) is 65% owned by Dato’ Yahya bin A. Jalil and 35% owned by Datin Mahmudah bte Md Ali.

(7) Ibzi Holdings Sdn Bhd is 99% owned by DYAM Tunku Ibrahim Ismail ibni DYMM Baginda Al-Mutawakkil Alallah Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (The Tengku Mahkota of Johor) and 1% owned by Raja Zarith Sofia bte Raja Idris (his consort).

The full corporate and financial details of the above are as follows:

(1) Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd
Company Reg. No. 469478-X
Registration Date: 26-09-1998

Registered Address:
3374, GF Jalan 8/31
Taman Sri Serdang
Seri Kembangan
Selangor

Business Address:
3, Jalan 222
Petaling Jaya
Selangor

Type of Business: Design and Build Contractor for the Gerbang Selantan Bersepadu Project

Authorised Capital: RM50,000,000.00
Paid Up Capital: RM18,400,000.00

Directors:
Name & Address (IC No.) - Position - Appointment

1) Dato’ Yahya Bin A. Jalil (560819-01-6437) - Managing Director -02-01-1999
13, Jalan 12/10
46200 Petaling Jaya
Selangor
(Also owns 65% of Ibex Corporation Amalgamated Sdn Bhd that owns 50% of Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd and that owns 60% of Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd)

2) Mohd Musthafa Bin Lathif (590608-71-5147) - Alternate Director - 23-12-2003
26 Medan Athinahapan 2
Taman Tun Dr. Ismail
Kuala Lumpur

3) Yoong Hoi Shing (521121-01-5115) - Director - 06-01-2000
61 Jalan SS1/19
47300 Petaling Jaya
Selangor

4) Kamal Hisham Bin Jaafar (700301-01-5853) - Director - 03-05-2002
6 Lorong Mutiara
Kampang Melayu
Johor
(Also Director of Ibzi Holdings Sdn Bhd and Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd)

5) Tan Sri Dato’ Razali Bin Ismail (390414-02-5037) - Director - 02-01-1999
1802, Desa Kudalari
3, Lorong Kuda
50450 Kuala Lumpur

6) Azahar Bin Abdul Aziz (550518-07-5397) - Director - 02-01-1999
27G, Jalan Pandan Indah 1/17
Pandan Indah
56100 Kuala Lumpur

7) Chock Eng Tah (571023-10-5227) - Director - 14-07-2003
38, Jalan USJ 2/51
UEP Subang Jaya
Selangor

8) Mohd Redza Shah Bin Abdul Wahid (630127-01-6269) - Director - 31-03-2006
6, Lorong PJU 7/21B
Mutiara Damansara
47800 Petaling Jaya
Selangor

9) Kong Seng Huat (590327-06-5117) - Director - 28-08-2003
65, Jalan SS 26/9
Taman Mayang Jaya
Selangor

10) Datuk Mohd Khamil Bin Jamil (560120-08-6175) - Director - 31-03-2006
Lot 2929, Jalan 5
Kemensah Heights
Ulu Kelang
68000 Ampang
Selangor

11) Anand Pon A/L Ponnudurai (561230-01-5351) - Director - 9-04-2002
7-08-4, Pantai Hill Park
Blok 7, Fasa 5
Jalan Pantai
5920 Kuala Lumpur

Shareholders:
Co. Reg. No. - Name of Company - Total Shares

1) 203430-W - DRB-HICOM Berhad - 3,680,000
2) 339525-W - Detik Nagasari Sdn Bhd - 3,680,000
3) 463227-X - Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd - 11,040,000

Financial Highlights (December 2003):

Fixed Assets RM7,147,914.00
Current Assets RM152,861,746.00
Total Assets RM -613,682.00
Issued Capital RM7,609,000.00
Paid Up Capital RM7,609,000.00
Unappropriated Profit RM -10,668,353.00

Long-Term Deffered Liabilities RM2,445,671.00
Current Liabilities RM160,623,342.00

Operating Revenue RM201,078,016.00
Profit Before Taxation RM -3,123,252.00
Profit After Taxation RM -3,155,055.00
Profit Attributes to Shareholders RM -3,155,055.00
Unappropriated Profit Carried Forward RM -10,668,353.00
Unappropriated Profit Brought Forward RM -7,513,298.00


(3) Detik Nagasari Sdn Bhd
Company Reg. No. 0339525-W
Registration Date: 10-04-1995

Registered Address:
11th Floor, Menara Berjaya
KL Paza, 179, Jalan Bukit Bintang
Kuala Lumpur

Business Address:
83, Jalan SS 25/2
Taman Bukit Emas
Petaling Jaya

Type of Business: Construction & Infrastructure Business

Authorised Capital: RM100,000.00
Paid Up Capital: RM100,000.00

Directors:
Name & Address (IC No.) - Position - Appointment

1) Kong Keng Ling (561105-08-5865) - Director - 25-09-1998
2) Datuk Wan Lokman Bin Dato Wan Ibrahim (460525-02-5129) - Director - 05-09-1996

Shareholder:

Transwater Corporation Bhd (Company no. 0067617-M) -100%
(Change of name from Transwater Bina Sdn Bhd to Transwater Corporation Sdn Bhd on 03.04.1986, and to Transwater Corporation Berhad and to Hyundai Berjaya Corporation Berhad on 21.07.2003, and to Hyundai-Sime Darby Berhad on 26.04.2005).

Financial Highlights:

Fixed Assets RM 1,321,800.00
Current Assets RM 94,382.00
Total Assets RM 1,416,182.00

Current Liabilities RM 1,606,440.00
Total Liabilities RM 1,606,440.00
Paid Up Capital RM 100,000.00
Rev. & Other Reserves RM -290,258.00
Net worth RM -190,258.00
Total RM 1,416,182.00

Turnover RM -3,588.00
Profit Before Tax RM -130,153.00
Profit After Tax RM -130,153.00
Profit & Loss for the Year RM -130,153.00


(4) Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd
Company Reg. No. 0463227-X
Registration Date: 30-05-1998

Registered Address:
3374, FG Jalan 18/31
Taman Sri Serdang
Sri Kembangan
Selangor

Business Address:
3, Jalan 222
Petaling Jaya
Selangor

Type of Business: Property Development

Authorised Capital: RM1,000,000.00
Paid Up Capital: RM 600,002.00

Directors:
Name (IC No.) - Position - Appointment

1) Anuar Hakim Bin Abdul Rahim (671127-06-5483) - Director - 09-12-1998
2) Kamal Hisham Bin Jaafar (700301-01-5853) - Director - 24-09-2002 (Also Director of Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd and Ibzi Holdings Sdn Bhd)
3) Dato’ Yahya Bin A. Jalil (560819-016437) - Director - 30-05-1998

Shareholders (company no.) - % of shares:

1) Ibex Corporation Amalgamated Sdn. Bhd (0065712-X) - 50%
2) Ibzi Holdings Sdn. Bhd. (0483228-P) - 50%

Financial Highlights (December 2000):

Fixed Assets RM417,235.00
Other Assets RM12,304,537.00
Current Assets RM132,798.00
Total Assets RM12,854,570.00

Current Liabilitites RM9,555,270.00
Long Term Liabiltites RM244,163.00
Total Liabilitites RM9,799,433.00
Paid Up Capital RM600,002.00
Shares Reserves RM -44,,865.00
Net Worth RM555,137.00
Minority Interest RM2,500,000.00
Total RM12,854,570.00

Profit Before Tax RM -7,661,183.00
Profit After Tax RM -44,865.00
Profit & Loss for the Year RM -44,865.00


(5) Hyundai-Sime Darby Berhad (Change of name from Transwater Bina Sdn Bhd to Transwater Corporation Sdn Bhd on 03.04.1986, and to Transwater Corporation Berhad and to Hyundai Berjaya Corporation Berhad on 21.07.2003, and to Hyundai-Sime Darby Berhad on 26.04.2005).

Authorised Capital: RM500,000,000.00
Paid-Up-Capital: RM182,563,000.00

Directors:
Name - Position - Appointed

1) Yeoh Choon San - Managing Director - 28-11-2003
2) Dato' Mohd Salleh Bin Ahmad - Independent Non-Executive - 07-07-2003
3) Lim Hock Chye - Independent Non-Executive - 7-7-2003
4) Yip Jon Khiam Non-Independent Non-Executive - 6-12-2004
5) Dato' Ahmad Zubair bin Haji Murshid - Non-Independent Non-Executive - 06-12-2004
6) Dato' Kalsom binti Abd. Rahman - Independent Non-Executive -01-03-2005
7) K Shekhar a/l S Krishnan – Non-Independent Non-Executive - 31-03-2005

Shareholders:
Shareholders - Shares Held - %

1) Tan Sri Dato' Seri Vincent Tan Chee Yioun - 52,654,550 - 46.6%
2) Berjaya Group Berhad - 52,654,550 - 46.6%
3) Bizurai Bijak (M) Sdn Bhd - 52,276,550 - 46.26%
4) Dato' Dr Tengku Retwan bin Tengku Mansor - 12,000,000 - 10.62%
5) Batumadu Sdn Bhd - 12,000,000 - 10.62%
6) Arbaain bin Bakar - 12,000,000 - 10.62%
7) Yeoh Choon San - 11,000,000 - 9.73%
8) Datuk Tengku Adnan bin Tengku Mansor - 7,139,000 - 6.32%
9) The Estate of Dato' Wan Adli bin Dato' Wan Ibrahim - 6,608,750 - 5.85%
10) Angsana Embun Sdn Bhd - 6,608,750 - 5.85%

Financial Highlights (April 2004):

Fixed Assets RM39,336,055.00
Other Assets RM4,407,956.00
Current Assets RM264,419,305.00
Total Assets RM318,163,316.00

Current Liabilities RM126,641,947.00
Long Term Liabilities RM20,087,511.00
Total Liabilities RM146,729,458.00

Turnover RM1,013,598,578.00
Profit Before Tax RM132,716,083.00
Net Worth RM171,322,588.00


(6) Ibex Corporation Amalgamated Sdn Bhd
Company Reg. No. 0065712-X
Registration Date: 19-12-1980

Registered Address:
Bangunan Ash Hiani, 3374, Jalan 18/31
Taman Sri Serdang
Sri Kembangan
Selangor

Business Address:
3, Jalan 51A/222
Petaling Jaya
Selangor

Type of Business: Property Renting

Authorised Capital: RM5,000,000.00
Paid Up Capital: RM2,000,000.00

Directors:
Name (IC No.) - Position - Appointment

1) Dato’ Yahya Bin A. Jalil (560819-01-6437) - Director - 19-12-1990
2) Datin Mahmudah bte Md Ali (700301-01-5853) - Director - 04-12-1986

Shareholders:
Name - % of shares

1) Dato’ Yahya Bin A. Jalil - 65%
2) Datin Mahmudah bte Md Ali - 35%

Financial Highlights (December 1998):

Fixed Assets RM6,041,716.00
Other Assets RM677,280.00
Current Assets RM2,488,599.00
Total Assets RM9,207,595.00

Current Liabilities RM9,319,847.00
Long Term Liabilities RM3,381,483.00
Total Liabilities RM12,701,330.00

Turnover RM1,061,035.00
Loss Before Tax RM1,729,031.00
Net Worth –RM3,493,735.00


(7) Ibzi Holdings Sdn Bhd
Company Reg. No. 0483228-P
Registration Date: 11-05-1999

Registered Address:
157A Jalan Sri Pelangi
Taman Pelangi
Johor Bahru
Johor

Business Address:
Bukit Pelangi
Jalan Pasir Pelangi
Johor Bahru
Johor

Type of Business: Investment Holding Company

Authorised Capital: RM5,000,000.00
Paid Up Capital: RM 250,000.00

Directors:
Name (IC No.) - Position - Appointment

1) DYAM Tunku Ibrahim Ismail ibni Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda Al-Mutawakkil Alallah Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj (5811220-01-5621) - Director - 01-08-2002
2) Raja Zarith Sofia bte Raja Idris (590814-08-5254) - Director - 01-08-2002
3) Kamal Hisham bin Jaafar (700301-01-5853) - Director - 01-02-2003 (Also Director of Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd and Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd)

Shareholders:
Name - % of shares

1) DYAM Tunku Ibrahim Ismail ibni DYMM Baginda Al-Mutawakkil Alallah Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj - 99%
2) Raja Zarith Sofia bte Raja Idris - 1%

SPECIAL REPORTS ARCHIVES
Special Report on the NEP archives

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Proton jawab Mahathir -- Jual MV Agusta elak syarikat terheret masalah kewangan - Mohd. Azlan

SHAH ALAM 16 Jun - Proton Holdings Bhd. (Proton) hari ini sekali lagi menjelaskan bahawa penjualan MV Agusta Motor SpA terpaksa dilakukan bagi mengelakkan Proton turut terheret ke dalam masalah kewangan syarikat motosikal berprestasi tinggi itu.

Pengerusi Proton, Datuk Mohd. Azlan Hashim berkata, penjelasan itu diulangi bagi menjawab persoalan yang dibangkitkan oleh bekas Perdana Menteri yang juga Penasihat Proton, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, baru-baru ini.

Mohd. Azlan berkata, Proton telah memberikan penjelasan terperinci mengenai isu pelupusan kepentingannya dalam MV Agusta pada Mac lalu, selain isu perubahan pengurusan pada Julai 2005.

Namun demikian, katanya, persoalan mengenai kedua-dua isu tersebut terus diperkatakan berikutan wujudnya apa yang disifatkan sebagai ‘spekulasi tanpa maklumat penuh' mengenainya.

Tambahnya, ia juga disebabkan oleh keengganan sesetengah pihak untuk menerima penjelasan yang telah diberikan itu.

Menurut Mohd. Azlan, beliau telah banyak kali berusaha untuk mengadakan pertemuan dengan Dr. Mahathir tetapi gagal kerana kesibukan bekas Perdana Menteri itu.

“Malah, kami juga telah menjemput Dr. Mahathir ke acara pelancaran Satria Neo tetapi beliau mengutus surat memberitahu tidak dapat datang kerana ada urusan lain,'' katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian dalam sidang akhbar selepas pelancaran Proton Satria Neo oleh Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi di sini hari ini.

Dr. Mahathir sebelum ini mempersoalkan keputusan menjual 57.75 peratus kepentingan Proton dalam MV Agusta pada harga nominal 1 Euro (RM4.57), Mac lalu.

Bekas Perdana Menteri mendesak Proton dan kerajaan memberikan jawapan kenapa kepentingan itu dijual sebegitu murah kepada sebuah syarikat Itali tanpa melalui sebarang proses tender.

Dr. Mahathir juga menuntut agar Proton memberikan sebab kenapa usaha untuk memaksimumkan nilai MV Agusta tidak dilakukan sebelum ia dijual.

Selain itu, beliau turut mengkritik Lembaga Pengarah Proton kerana menyingkirkan Tan Sri Tengku Mahaleel Tengku Ariff daripada jawatan Ketua Pegawai Eksekutifnya.

Kepentingan dalam MV Agusta dibeli semasa Tengku Mahaleel menerajui Proton dan Dr. Mahathir masih Perdana Menteri dengan harga 70 juta Euro (RM315 juta) pada Disember 2004.

Proton kemudiannya terpaksa menyediakan peruntukan khas yang menjadikan keseluruhan pertimbangan pembelian MV Agusta bernilai RM367.6 juta.

Ia kemudiannya dijual kepada GEVI SpA, sebuah syarikat kewangan di Itali yang turut mengambil alih hutang MV Agusta sebanyak 107 juta Euro (RM481.5 juta).

Mohd. Azlan berkata, keseluruhan pertimbangan pembelian dianggap sebagai goodwill dan dilupuskan dalam tahun kewangan berakhir 31 Mac 2005.

Katanya, peruntukan tambahan berkaitan Agusta dalam penyata tahun kewangan berakhir 31 Mac 2006 berjumlah RM136.2 juta.

“Kita telah mendapatkan nasihat daripada perunding bebas dan bank pelaburan - MV Agusta berkemungkinan jatuh bankrap.

“Jika MV Agusta bankrap, Proton akan jatuh sama dengan menanggung liabiliti berjumlah RM923.1 juta,'' katanya.

Mengenai dakwaan Dr. Mahathir bahawa Dasar Automotif Negara (DAN) menjadikan Proton kurang berdaya saing, Pengarah Urusan Proton, Syed Zainal Abidin Syed Mohd. Tahir berkata: “DAN telah memberi penjelasan mengenai arah tuju ke hadapan.

“Untuk tempoh lima tahun lagi, kita tahu apa yang hendak dibuat dan strategi boleh disusun,” ujarnya.

Sementara itu, Mohd. Azlan menolak kenyataan Tengku Mahaleel bahawa MV Agusta akan mempelbagaikan aliran perolehan dan mengurangkan kebergantungan Proton kepada pasaran kereta negara ini yang semakin sengit persaingannya.

Katanya, Agusta menanggung kerugian selama lebih enam tahun iaitu sebanyak 118 juta Euro (RM531 juta) sehingga 31 Disember 2005.

Mengenai dakwaan pemilikan MV Agusta itu bertujuan membantu Proton mencapai sinergi operasi, kejuruteraan dan teknologi, Mohd. Azlan berkata, sinergi seumpamanya tidak wujud.

“Ia disahkan oleh penasihat yang dilantik syarikat. Proton mengeluarkan kereta tetapi MV Agusta mengeluarkan motosikal berprestasi tinggi.

Mohd. Azlan berkata, MV Agusta bukan seperti Honda yang memiliki perniagaan motosikal dan kereta, sebaliknya adalah motosikal untuk pasaran khusus dan mahal.

Mengenai penyingkiran Tengku Mahaleel, beliau berkata, Lembaga Pengarah Proton semasa bersidang pada 25 Julai 2005 memutuskan untuk tidak memperbaharui tempoh perkhidmatan beliau.

“Maka, bekas CEO itu bersara dan bercuti sehingga genap tempoh tamat perkhidmatannya. Ini sememangnya di dalam bidang kuasa syarikat dan Lembaga Pengarah,'' katanya.

Mohd. Azlan turut menyatakan bahawa Proton adalah aset nasional dan sebuah institusi, bukannya satu entiti milik peribadi.

Maka itu, ujarnya, adalah mustahak Lembaga Pengarah bertindak proaktif bagi memastikan Proton diurus sewajarnya dan bersedia menghadapi cabaran yang mendatang.

“Tiada sesiapa secara perseorangan boleh menerima pujian sehingga Proton berdiri teguh. Orang datang dan pergi kerana itulah sifat pengurus yang profesional,'' katanya.

“Perubahan pengurusan di syarikat korporat adalah perkara biasa. Ini bukan syarikat milik keluarga. Warga Proton telah menerima perubahan dan begitu juga industri automotif,'' katanya.

Ditanya sama ada kedudukan Dr. Mahathir sebagai penasihat akan dikaji semula, Mohd. Azlan berkata: “Tidak pernah terlintas di fikiran untuk mengkaji semula atau menamatkan jawatannya kerana Dr. Mahathir adalah penasihat kami.''

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Our sugar being sold to neighbouring countries??? YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!!


PORT KLANG: Sugar traders are impervious to the sugar shortage currently hurting some Malaysian states.

Most of the unscrupulous traders are selling the “sweet commodity” to neighbouring countries where a much higher profit margin could be gained.

Sugar is sold at RM1.30 a kg in Malaysia and retails at RM1.80 to RM1.90 a kg in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines.

Selangor Customs director Datuk Mohamed Khalid Yusof said he believed sugar traders were cashing in on the price difference.

“Selling of sugar is legal if the traders have permits. It is a lucrative business owing to the price difference. We will scrutinise all documents pertaining to this commodity to ensure the traders do not smuggle out sugar to increase their profit margin,” he said.

He added that the Customs Enforcement Patrol Unit was keeping a vigilant eye along the Selangor coast, especially on barter trade boats.

“Our men are using the loop method, where the barter boats plying our waters would have to pass our patrol boats. It is a good surveillance tactic ,and has worked well in nabbing smugglers,” he said.

Yesterday, the Customs Department here detained an Indonesian barter trade boat – KM Tuah Bersama – and seized 50,000kg of sugar.

“Our men detained the boat after the skipper failed to produce an export permit. At this moment the boat is being held at the Port Klang jetty with the 1,000 bags of sugar. Investigations are ongoing to find out if there is a permit as the Indonesian skipper is unsure of its existence,” he said.

It is learnt that the boat was supposed to unload the sugar at Tanjung Balai Asahan in Indonesia.

On the boat are a 12-man crew, all of whom have been barred from leaving the boat.

Khalid said under the Customs Act 1967 Section 135(1)(e), the penalty for smuggling is RM50,000 or 20 times the value of the goods, or a jail sentence of three years, or both.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

M’sia lucky to have Pak Lah, Najib


I refer to the letter Be grateful air is still free. The statement, ‘It sounds petty but to most of us there is no more room for cutting costs’ by Anum Suhayyla is very apt for the majority of the rakyat as far as their financial position is concerned.

I am a pensioner surviving on a meagre monthly allowance. Ever since retirement I have been very careful with my daily expenditure. For my daily lunch and dinner, I have been marketing for the cheapest fish and vegetables possible. Ikan ‘kembung’ happened to be the cheapest in the market. Now, with the increase in petrol price, the price of ‘kembung’, too, has escalated. What other choice am I left with?

For transport, I have been driving my old Proton Saga, which has been giving trouble all this while. Lately, when I sent the car for repair, I was handed a repair bill which almost made my heart stop. I was told by my mechanic that he had no choice. Everything has gone up in prices. Looks like I cannot even maintain an old car. What other choice do have I?

Very soon, I believe, water and electricity rates will go up. What should I do then?

But we have a 'very good' leader in Najib Razak, who asked us to change our lifestyles which I will gladly follow. Here’s how:

* I will consume one kembung fish every alternate day.
* I will sell my old car and walk.
* I will dig a well in my house and use candlelight every night.

Datuk Najib, a very big thank you for your very good advice. We cannot find such 'fine' leaders like you and Pak Lah all the world over. Malaysia must be very lucky to have you both.

A letter from SOMEONE.

Dr M, Pak Lah and the economy!

ONE of the things that infuriates former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is the claim that he had spent all the money when he handed over power to Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

The Tun hotly disputes this and says the country has plenty of funds and the present Government could implement some of the mega projects approved under his administration. As examples, he said the Government could use funds in Petronas and the Employees Provident Fund.

I am not quite sure if anyone had specifically accused the Tun of leaving his successor with a bankrupt Treasury. Certainly, there were comments made by a number of economists and analysts that when Pak Lah took over the reins of Government at the end of October 2003, as much as 75% of the funds allocated under the 8th Malaysia Plan (2000-05) had already been spent or committed.

To appreciate the controversy, we need to go back to a bit of economic history.

When the 8MP was unveiled, Malaysia was just emerging from the throes of the Asian financial crisis. The economy was still weak, and investor confidence fragile.

The Government under Dr Mahathir felt it was imperative that it bolstered the sluggish economy through pump priming, meaning spending more money to lift the economy since the private sector was holding back its investments.

The strategy worked and, as a result, the economy was nursed back to reasonable health.

But there was a cost. Pump priming was implemented at the expense of a growing budget deficit, meaning government expenditure was higher than revenue.

The state of the Government’s finances is similar to the finances of an ordinary family – only many, many times larger and more complex.

Say, a family’s monthly income is RM8,000, and the total spending of that family is RM10,000. The deficit is RM2,000.

Now, this is tolerable if the deficit is temporary (say, a couple of months) and the family can call on its savings to make up for the shortfall. But if the family continues to incur a deficit and resort to debt to make up for the shortfall, sooner or later that family will be in deep financial trouble.

It’s the same with a country.

When Abdullah took over, the Government’s budget deficit was a matter of concern.

According to Treasury figures, the budget deficit was RM20.25bil in 2002 and RM20.93bil in 2003. This was equivalent to 5.6% and 5.3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) respectively.

A rule of thumb among international financial circles is that a 5% budget deficit to GDP is a warning sign.

A government that continuously chalks up budget deficits above 5% would be seen as profligate, and confidence in that government’s economic management would erode, and could lead to a massive capital flight.

Therefore, when Abdullah took over the administration he was confronted with an unenviable choice: take the populist approach and continue with budget deficit financing or impose fiscal restraint and upset vested economic interests.

Abdullah chose fiscal restraint. As he said, it was the most difficult choice he had to make as Prime Minister.

Fiscal restraint means cutting off or postponing projects that are either wasteful, not a priority or could be deferred until a later stage when the Government’s finances are stronger.

In doing so, Abdullah had endured a lot of anger and criticism from vested-interest groups, who had been too reliant on government contracts for their prosperity, many of whom are from his Umno party.

The Government’s policy of fiscal discipline is yielding results. According to the Treasury’s Economic Report, the budget deficit has been reduced to 4.3% of GDP in 2004, 3.8% in 2005 and is expected to fall further to 3.5% in 2006.

Had the Government allowed the budget deficit to grow, the Government and national debt rating could be downgraded to junk bond status.

Can you tolerate a scenario where Malaysia goes to the international capital markets for a loan and is being charged 7% or 8% higher than Thailand or Indonesia?

In my view, the Government must strive for a balanced or surplus budget.

What about Dr Mahathir’s argument that the Government should tap the funds in Petronas and EPF? He suggests these funds are lying idle. “It’s like keeping money under the pillow,” he said.

I think it’s unwise to look towards Petronas and the EPF whenever the Government faces a financial shortfall.

It must be clear: Petronas and EPF money are not there for the Government’s taking. They belong to the people. The nation’s oil resources are vested in Petronas by law. It has done a great job managing our oil and gas resources as well as its huge profits, although some say it should provide more information about its accounts.

Petronas is a well-managed corporation with an impressive record at home and abroad. It is a great national asset.

Petronas contributes to nation building by paying royalties, taxes and dividends to the Government as well as its various activities. These come up to billions of ringgit annually.

Our oil and gas resources are finite, and Petronas must manage its reserves (oil and profits) prudently to serve the nation well into the future.

The EPF was set up as a national pension fund before Independence and is 100% funded from deductions from the salaries of employees and contributions from employers. The money belongs to EPF members. They are the ones who would suffer for any losses incurred by the EPF – and there had been some horrendous losses in the past.

The Government has always tapped EPF money to fund national development. Most EPF funds are invested in government bonds and securities, which incidentally, carry an interest rate of between 3% and 3.5% when the EPF is paying out 5% to its contributors.

Last June, the Government announced a RM2.5bil plan to build new homes and accommodation for the police. The funding would come from the EPF and the Pension Fund. These institutions will get a guaranteed return from the Government that is higher than the yield from government securities.

Therefore, leave Petronas and the EPF alone, and let the professionals do their job.

Dr Mahathir did a great job getting Malaysia out of the Asian financial crisis and nursing it back to reasonable health. Pak Lah is building upon the success of his predecessor, but faced with a new set of challenges and a vastly changed global economic landscape, he has little choice but to re-orientate the nation’s economic priorities.

The 9th Malaysia Plan targets a healthy annual growth rate of 6%. There is new money for the Government to spend because of increased revenues. A sum of RM200bil is allocated for development under the Plan, a good deal more than under the 8th Plan. Malaysians must get behind Pak Lah's Government to ensure the 9th Plan is successfully implemented for the benefit of all.

Lagu Baru UMNO?? YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!!



Bersatu Kita Bersatu

Dengan Setia Berganding Bahu

Tipu Terus Menipu

Kita Tipu Melayu

Bersama Kita Bersama

Mendukung Hasrat Semua

Berjasa Pada Kroni

Anak Isteri Dan 'Bini'

Lambang Kita Yang Gagah

Dipandang Keji Dan Haprak

Bersatu Bersetia Khianat

Cogan Katanya

UMNO Terus Lara

Rompak Rakyat Malaysia

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Not worth the paper it is written on!!!

Not worth the paper it is written on

Raja Petra Kamarudin

They say in legal circles that a verbal agreement is not worth the paper
it is written on. Islam says, if a man breaks his word up to three
times, then do not take him as a friend or comrade. Islamic scholar or
ulamak Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, also currently Prime Minister of Malaysia,
gave his word and he broke it more than three times. Abdullah,
therefore, cannot be taken as a friend either in the western or Islamic
perspective.

And who did Abdullah give his word to? He gave it to previous Prime
Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad -- and of course to all Malaysians in
his 2004 Election Manifesto, which he has also broken. And what did he
promise Dr Mahathir? Many things, amongst which are that the Scenic or
'Crooked' Bridge would not be abandoned, the double tracking railway
line would be pursued, and the national car, Proton, would be supported
-- just to mention but three.

After Dr Mahathir announced his resignation to a shocked Umno General
Assembly in mid-2002, Abdullah and Dr Mahathir spent 15 months in
countless conferences to discuss what the former should and would do
when he finally takes over as Prime Minister in November 2003. Dr
Mahathir went into great detail and explained at length why he did what
he did in his 22 years as Malaysia's Prime Minister. Dr Mahathir had a
reason for his many perceived lunatic moves. Even Abdullah, who was his
deputy soon after Anwar Ibrahim's exit in September 1998, could not
understand everything that Dr Mahathir did. Now he does.

Abdullah sat there taking pages after pages of notes as Dr Mahathir gave
him a 15-month crash course in Mahanomics (synonymous with Reaganomics).
By the end of the 15-month training and orientation programme, Abdullah
understood fully what was in the head of that strange animal called
Mahathir. More importantly, Abdullah now saw the logic in Dr Mahathir's
every move and agreed that, though sometimes somewhat devious, many of
these moves were actually quite necessary in the pursuit of the bigger
objective.

Many of Dr Mahathir's moves would certainly appear loony to the
uninitiated. They would appear even stranger when viewed in the backdrop
of what was perceived as a failed plan. Dr Mahathir was a blunderer and
the many disasters he left as a legacy to Abdullah in November 2003 laid
testimony to this. But Abdullah knew they were no disasters. He did not
know earlier of course. But 15 months of sitting in front of Dr Mahathir
and taking notes as the Prime Minister imparted his innermost thoughts
left Abdullah with no doubts that this old man knew what he was up to
and these moves could only be labelled as brilliant.

Take the Scenic or 'Crooked' Bridge as one example. No one would
disagree if we were to say that this is the most stupid idea yet to come
out of Dr Mahathir's mind. Why build half a bridge? Why build such a
silly looking bridge that would wind its way around because it had to
join the Causeway halfway across the Straits of Johor or Tebrau Straits?

If they built a full bridge, then the bridge could be built straight,
lower and shorter at maybe almost the same cost as half a bridge. But
now they are building half a bridge, so it has to be crooked and higher
-- and the cost for half a bridge is not half the cost of a full,
straight bridge. But they can't build a straight or full bridge because
Singapore will not allow their half of the Causeway to be demolished and
they are not interested in building the other half of the bridge on
their side or within their territorial waters.

Singapore could of course agree to join Malaysia in this bridge project
and agree to the Causeway being demolished and a full, straight bridge
be built to replace the Causeway. But Singapore wanted the bridge to be
packaged with a lot of other goodies, all in Singapore's favour. These
goodies would be like throwing in the supply of sand, allowing Singapore
Air Force planes more flights over Malaysian air space, plus a re-look
at the water agreement.

Dr Mahathir did not agree to this. He would not package the bridge with
all these other issues and he wanted each issue to be an issue by itself
and to be negotiated separately and on its own merits. Dr Mahathir was
no fool. He knew if he rejected Singapore's demand for a packaged deal,
then Singapore would not agree to the bridge. Malaysia could go on with
the bridge if it wanted, but it can only build a bridge on Malaysia's
side, not on Singapore's side. Therefore it would have to be a
silly-looking half-bridge that would need to be highly elevated and
winding.

That was exactly what Dr Mahathir wanted. He wanted Singapore to reject
the full, straight bridge idea and stipulate that Malaysia can only
build half a bridge if it still insisted on proceeding with the plan. Dr
Mahathir did not want a full bridge. He wanted a half-bridge. A full
bridge would mean it would have to be straight and therefore low. A
half-bridge would force the bridge to curve and therefore it would have
to be built highly elevated.

What Dr Mahathir really wanted is the space beneath the bridge which a
full bridge would not offer while a half-bridge would. And why did he
want this space? He wanted it because he wanted large container ships
and oil tankers to be able to sail under the bridge.

The Straits of Melaka is one of the busiest sea lanes in the world. But
ships plying the Straits cannot reach Johor Port unless they sail around
Singapore. So they would rather stop at the Port of Singapore instead of
coming to Johor. Even ships carrying goods bound for Malaysia would
rather stop at Singapore for transhipment to Malaysia rather than sail
to Malaysia. Once there is a highly elevated bridge, then the ships can
bypass Singapore and come straight to Malaysia.

In short, a highly elevated 'crooked' bridge would boost the viability
of Johor Port and pose a serious threat to the Port of Singapore. To be
more dramatic, the bridge could actually kill the Port of Singapore and
make Johor Port the new centre for imports to and exports from Malaysia
-- plus for those Indonesian importers and exporters as well who
currently would rather use Singapore than sail the extra distance around
Singapore to come to Johor.

That was what Dr Mahathir really wanted. He was not actually interested
in the bridge. He was more interested in Malaysia overtaking Singapore
in the port business. And the crooked, high, half-bridge would be able
to achieve this. A straight, low, full bridge would not. Dr Mahathir
very cleverly manoeuvred so that Singapore would disagree with the full
bridge and would instead ask Malaysia to proceed with half a bridge.
Once they said that, Dr Mahathir got them exactly where he wanted them.
The half-bridge is Singapore's idea, not Dr Mahathir's, so Singapore
cannot now turn around and say that they had been tricked and the bridge
was merely a Red Herring and that the real motive was to outdo the Port
of Singapore.

Somehow, along the way, Malaysia's Foreign Minister packaged the supply
of sand and more SAF flights over Malaysian air space in the bridge
deal. Dr Mahathir never agreed to this. But Abdullah did for reasons
known only to himself and his son-in-law, Khairy Jamaluddin. The sand
would of course come from Johor and those individuals who will be
awarded the contract to supply sand to Singapore are family members of
those involved in the decision-making process at the very top echelons
of power -- those walking in the corridors of power. The supply of sand
is not a government effort but a private arrangement. What is even more
perturbing to Dr Mahathir is that Singapore did not demand that the
supply of sand be included in the deal. This idea came from Malaysia. It
was Malaysia that proposed it, not Singapore that demanded it.

When the Johor Menteri Besar found out about the supply of sand
arrangement he was outraged. Dr Mahathir had banned the export of sand
back in 1997 and Johor was quite happy with this as the sand was coming
from Johor and it is the politicians and their cronies who are making
hundreds of millions out of it. For the first time in his life this very
polished man who always has a sweet smile for anyone he encounters lost
his cool. He never raises his voice, especially to the Prime Minister.
But that day he did and he told the Prime Minister that Umno Johor will
strongly oppose any Johor sand being sold to Singapore. Even the palace
got into the act and there was a danger of another Constitutional Crisis
erupting.

In short, there was a mutiny and Johor was in revolt. A crisis never
before seen in Malaysian history was about to explode. This was a
state-federal conflict in the making. Abdullah had blundered big time.
He had agreed that the bridge would include the supply of sand to
Singapore. Now Johor, the source of the sand, put its foot down and
threatened to resist at whatever cost, and Johor can be as independent
as Kelantan if it so wishes. They would also reveal the names of all
those who stand to benefit from this supply of sand; family members of
those at the very top of the Abdullah administration. If you think the
Mahathir-Anwar crisis was exciting, the supply of sand to Singapore
would dwarf this by far.

Two days later, Abdullah announced that the bridge project would be
aborted, after starting work on it (and incurring a liability of RM100
million). Three weeks before that, Parliament had reiterated the bridge
project would go on and the Minister of Works himself assured Parliament
that this would be so. But now it was off. They would not be proceeding
with the bridge. They could not proceed with it. To proceed with it
would mean they have to supply sand to Singapore. And this would create
a massive crisis between the federal government and the Johor state
government. The only way out of the supply of sand commitment would be
to abort the bridge project. No bridge, no sand, and no federal
government-Johor state government crisis, plain and simple.

But it is out of the frying pan, into the fire. Without the bridge,
there would be no way ships could sail to Johor Port through the Straits
and the Port of Singapore would continue to dominate this region. Dr
Mahathir's plan to build up Johor Port and challenge Singapore's
dominance was thwarted. And it was thwarted by no other than his
successor who had promised him that the bridge would go on. And it was
thwarted because some greedy people in the decision-making team had
tried to get rich quick through selling sand to Singapore by packaging
the sand supply deal in the bridge proposal.

Dr Mahathir was hopping mad. Abdullah had made a big booboo, and to get
out of this booboo he cancelled the bridge project. Abdullah was trying
to save his arse. But in doing so he sacrificed Malaysia. Johor Port
would now have to remain as pathetic as it has always been. And the Port
of Singapore would remain the big wheel of this region. Flushed down the
toilet is Dr Mahathir's plan for overtaking Singapore. And, to make it
worse, Abdullah had promised Dr Mahathir the bridge would go on. And he
understood fully well why it must. And he realised that the bridge was
for the good of Malaysia's commerce. But saving his arse was his first
priority. Saving Johor Port has to come second.

That is the story of the 'Crooked' Bridge. There are many other stories
such as about the double tracking railway line, the national car, and
more. Suffice to say, the double tracking railway line had the same
objective as the 'Crooked' Bridge; in that Malaysia's commerce would
improve and Singapore's dominance in the region would be given a serious
challenge. But Abdullah aborted this as well.

The double tracking railway line was actually the first move. Once the
double tracking was done, then the high speed train was supposed to
follow. Imagine the day when one could live in a cheaper town like Ipoh
where property prices are half those in the big city, yet work in Kuala
Lumpur -- and the time it takes to get to work from Ipoh would be faster
than driving from Subang Jaya to Kuala Lumpur today. The small towns
would boom and development would be spread out throughout the country
instead of concentrated in a few key areas like it is today. But that
too now remains just a dream.

The MV Agusta matter is another issue. Dr Mahathir was going to use MV
Agusta to develop a peoples' car (volks wagen) that could be marketed
for as low as RM10,000, or less. MV Agusta had the technology to do this
and the cost to buy MV Agusta, in spite of it debts, was still lower
than embarking on this project doing your own R&D from scratch. R&D
costs billions of Ringgit and to develop a car from scratch would not
only cost more but would be time consuming as well. Even if you are
prepared to pay the higher cost, the time would take too long. MV Agusta
was a short cut and at a cheaper price on top of that.

But MV Agusta was sold off for RM4 and Dr Mahathir's RM10,000 peoples'
car went down the toilet, just like all the others. In fact, the sale of
MV Agusta itself raises other questions. How did they decide who to sell
it to and do those in the decision-making process have an interest in
the company that bought MV Agusta? (Which raises the issue of conflict
of interest.) Dr Mahathir knows the real story, as he does about who
those sand suppliers are, but he is not revealing all, at least not just
yet.

It is not that Abdullah is ignorant about all this. He knows the agenda
behind the 'Crooked' Bridge, double tracking railway line, MV Agusta,
and much more. He knows that all these are mere catalysts for bigger
things. And he agreed that these are necessary for the future of the
country. Yet he dismantled them one by one just to make it appear like
Dr Mahathir is stupid and that all his ideas are stupid. It is all about
politics and of trying to undermine Dr Mahathir. And what better way to
do this than to dismantle what Dr Mahathir started and give the
impression that the previous Prime Minister was a nut case. So the
country suffers. So what? That is the small picture. The big picture is:
Dr Mahathir is embarrassed.

The Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is another thing that Dr Mahathir was and
still is against. All those years he was prime minister he resisted the
FTA. Then, late last year, Abdullah secretly signed the FTA with Japan
whereby Japanese automobiles would have free access to the Malaysian
market while Malaysian vegetables would have free access to the Japanese
market. Malaysian vegetables? What vegetables do we have that we can
export to Japan? We do not even grow enough for our own consumption and
almost everything we eat needs to be supplemented with imports. Anyway,
do the Japanese eat our vegetables? Abdullah might as well have signed
an FTA with Canada whereby we export ice cubes to the Eskimos.

The FTA Abdullah signed with Japan was so confidential that even the
Cabinet did not know about it until Abdullah informed its members later,
after it had been signed. The Cabinet members were shocked, but by then
it was too late to do anything about it. And how is Proton going to
survive once Japanese cars get free access to the Malaysian market when
even Europe and the United States can't compete with them?

Proton is a dead man walking. Its days are numbered and it will be just
a matter of time when the national car folds. As the Malays would say:
siap kain kapan (prepare the funeral shroud).

Now the United States also wants the FTA with Malaysia signed and the
US-Malaysia FTA would open all government contracts and procurement to
US companies. That is the end of the New Economic Policy. The days of
the Bumiputera businessmen are numbered. Malays will have to revert to
becoming clerks and drivers again.

Dr Mahathir is beginning to doubt whether Abdullah knows what he is
doing. As far as Dr Mahathir is concerned, whatever he did, he did with
the interest of the nation at heart. But Abdullah's moves, the way Dr
Mahathir sees it, are moves of a traitor who does not care about the
country's interest. Dr Mahathir is quite prepared to allow Abdullah to
run this country the way he, as Prime Minister, sees fit. But Dr
Mahathir will not remain silent and allow this state of affairs to
continue if, as he put it, Malaysia's sovereignty is jeopardised. Dr
Mahathir would rather take on Abdullah than allow the man to destroy
this country. Not just Dr Mahathir, but many Umno veterans as well
believe that power in the hands of Abdullah is like giving a flower to a
monkey. Monkeys do not appreciate the beauty of flowers.

Monday, June 12, 2006

PM: I didn’t know I had 11 unpaid summonses


KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was unaware that he had 11 unpaid traffic summonses.

He said he did not know about them until he was informed by Deputy Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan yesterday and would pay them all tomorrow.

“I was just informed by Musa. I did not know about them. The last time I had summonses, I paid them all. Thank you for letting me know.

“I will find out who were driving the cars on those days,” he told reporters after launching the police family day celebration here yesterday.

The Prime Minister was asked to comment on an allegation by DAP that he had 11 unpaid traffic summonses.

On Thursday, DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng claimed that police had given Abdullah discounts worth 70% on his 11 summonses.

Lim said the police website www.rilek.com.my showed that three cars, with the registration plates WJB2800, WLP3142 and WCH13, under Abdullah’s name, accumulated a total of RM3,300 in fines from June 29, 2002 to Aug 3, 2005.

The amount was reduced to RM1,000 after the discount.

The 11 offences were traffic obstruction, parking at no parking areas, parking at the wrong side of the road and speeding.

Earlier, when opening the family day celebration, Abdullah said everyone should love their family and not abandon their children or ageing parents.

“Family is the best because when nobody likes you anymore, your family will always be there for you,” he said.

He said parents should love their children equally so that none of them would feel left out.

He also said husbands and wives should appreciate each other, and show their love and affection.

“There is no point in regretting or feeling guilty after your spouse is gone. Love them while they are still with you.”

Dr M: I want wrongs set right

LANGKAWI: Set right what has gone wrong for the sake of the country’s future.

That is all former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has asked of his successor Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

“I have no intentions of toppling Abdullah and I am not trying to make a political comeback.

“But something has gone very wrong, and I hope Abdullah will do something about it,” he said, implying that there were elements of external control in the administration of the Government.

Dr Mahathir said he did not understand the need to reverse decisions on certain mega projects.

With more than RM300bil in the national reserve, and RM300bil in the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), he said the Government could afford such projects.

“If the Government does not borrow from EPF, the depositors will gain nothing. It is like keeping money under the pillow,” he said in an interview here yesterday.

Dr Mahathir was in Langkawi to present the inaugural OGSM (Obstetrical and Gynaecological Society of Malaysia) address in conjunction with the 16th OGSM congress on Saturday night.

Dr Mahathir said Malaysia had enough trade surplus to sustain eight months of retained imports.

“Therefore, the excuse that we do not have the money is not acceptable,” he said.

Noting that ministers, including Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein, had made personal attacks against him, Dr Mahathir said some of the statements were uncalled for.

“They accuse me of suffering from post-prime ministerial syndrome!

“I did not make any personal attack on Abdullah. All I asked was why my questions related to AP (approved permit), the selling of MV Agusta shares, and the scrapped second bridge to Singapore were not answered.

“Instead of giving me straightforward answers, they attack me,” he said.

He said the administration had managed to deflate the issue by giving long-winded answers to his questions.

“I am still waiting for direct answers to my questions.

“I want to know why a lot of APs were given to two persons who have no shops (to sell cars).

“The two are selling APs at a very high price. They have become rich, doing no other business other than selling APs.

“For the sale of Agusta, I want to know if the intended sale was advertised. How was the buyer identified? Who is the buyer? How was the sale derived?” he asked.


Related Stories:
Mahathir upset with PKR report
Shahrir: Government doesn't have to answer Dr M

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Dr M: I want answers

KUALA LUMPUR: Stressing that he is not picking a fight with Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi or the Government, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said he merely wants answers to questions on certain policies ditched by the current administration.

The former premier said his questions need not necessarily be answered by the Prime Minister, but could be replied to by the relevant ministers.

Dr Mahathir singled out four issues: the Government’s decision to scrap the Johor bridge, the sale of MV Agusta, the issuance of Approved Permits (AP) for car imports, and why Proton Holding Bhd chief executive officer Tengku Tan Sri Mahaleel Tengku Ariff’s contract was not renewed.

“I am not fighting with the Prime Minister,” he told reporters after delivering his keynote address at the International Islamic Fair conference here yesterday.

“I only do not agree with certain things that had been done. And I want to know why. I have no problem with the Government. I have problems with the things that had been done.”.

He was responding to the Cabinet ministers’ reaction to his outburst on Wednesday, when he accused the Abdullah administration of dismantling many of his policies and project ”I’m interested in finding answers to why Agusta was sold to an Italian company with a two-Euro capital. Why do you sack a chief executive officer (of Proton) who has been managing well and made the company profitable? And why appoint somebody who made it unprofitable, and lose RM500mil?

“Why was the (Johor) bridge not built when work had already started and it was already agreed to by the Cabinet and when Singapore was not complaining? “Instead, the focus is Dr Mahathir should keep his mouth shut.”

He said he had written questions to the relevant authorities, including the Proton management and Securities Commission but had yet to get answers.

“Why did they sack Tengku Mahaleel? What is his fault? They should explain. I am the adviser,” he said.

“I want to know why the ongoing project was ditched. Is it because of a lack of funds? As far I know, there is money. “That’s why I asked, but some people say Dr Mahathir should not speak. He has retired; he should go back and sleep.”

On Abdullah’s reaction, Dr Mahathir said: “I am happy that he said that it is my right to speak. Yes, very good. Thank you very much. So now I’m speaking because he said I have the right to speak; but some others said I have no right to speak.”

Dr Mahathir also expressed disappointment that some ministers who were also in his Cabinet were questioning his right to criticise instead of answering his questions.

“What is disappointing is that instead of explaining, all the talk is whether I have been right in making the criticism, whether I’m following the Umno tradition,” he said. “Maybe they don’t have answers, that is why they try to demonise me or try to make me appear very bad. “Apparently, from the way ministers invariably support everything the Prime Minister says, there cannot be much debate in the Cabinet.

“Two days before, they say we will build the bridge. When the Prime Minister said we would not build the bridge, everybody said we would not build the bridge. I am a bit sad.

“I raised questions, none has been explained. Instead, they say Dr Mahathir should not speak like that. He has no right as an ex-prime minister ... should go back and sleep, not disturb people. “Every time I say something, the same people or members of the Cabinet will give their standard comments.

“I say something today, I’m quite sure you will ask the ministers to say something. These were my Cabinet ministers. Before, they agreed with me.”

Asked whether he would continue to speak out on government policies and decisions, he replied: “If there is anything wrong, I claim the right to ask questions. Or is it that we cannot ask questions?”

Asked whom he meant when he said the Government came under the “influence of people with an agenda”, he replied: “A lot of people talk about it. I don’t dare to tell. You will ask others to comment 'Why Dr Mahathir say like that?’”

Asked his opinion of Umno Youth deputy chief Khairy Jamaluddin, he replied: “He is (Abdullah's) son-in-law.

You want to fish for information so that I will react. You are trying to get me into a controversy. I understand that Khairy is the son-in-law. That’s all.”

On Tengku Razaleigh's call to Abdullah and Dr Mahathir to meet to resolve the issue, as the controversy might split Umno, he said: “I think he is competent to make such a remark because once upon a time, he challenged me.

“When he lost, he formed a new party, he split the party. He knows about it, that’s why he is advising me not to do that.

“Just like Tun Musa Hitam. He said that (what I did) was not in keeping with party tradition because, once before, he also made that mistake. Now he wants to warn me not make the same mistake.”

Asked whether he had posed his questions to Abdullah when they met in Japan recently, Dr Mahathir said: “It was a 10-minute meeting. He was talking about a lot of things; I was listening.”

Related Stories:
PM thanks supporters
Musa: Dr M's criticism improper
MCA among parties backing Abdullah

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Dr M slams Pak Lah but BN leaders rally behind the PM??? YAU MOU GAU...CHOR!!!

PUTRAJAYA: Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad levelled his strongest criticism yet against Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, accusing the Prime Minister of dismantling many of his policies and projects.

The former Prime Minister, who retired in 2003, said Abdullah had not been his first choice as successor but second after current Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

Dr Mahathir said he was hurt by allegations that he “finished all the Government's money, and that the Government was bankrupt” because of mega-infrastructure projects that marked his 22 years in power.

Dr Mahathir said Najib received the highest votes but he decided to choose Abdullah anyway. However, Dr Mahathir did not elaborate.

He said this at a press conference with local and foreign journalists, which lasted more than an hour, at the Perdana Leadership Foundation yesterday. The media was invited there to cover a briefing on the upcoming Perdana Global Peace Forum to be held in Kuala Lumpur later this month.

The former Prime Minister said the Government was “out of my control”, and he did not know if things would be any different if he had picked someone else as successor.

“I expect a reasonable degree of gratefulness, but instead I was told that I have indulged in mega projects and finished the country’s money,” he said, adding that he had made many mistakes in his life, such as helping many people only to have them stab him in the back.

Asked if Abdullah had stabbed him in the back, Dr Mahathir replied: “Minor bruises.”

He added: “I have a habit of choosing the wrong people, perhaps. But the present Government can still do a good job; the means are there.

“But if they come under the influence of people with other agendas, it cannot be helped.”

When asked who were the influential people with other agendas, he declined further commenting, stating that the media was already in the know.

Dr Mahathir said he was not interfering with the Government of the day, and it was not his plan when he decided to step down as Prime Minister.

“When I decided to step down, I planned not to interfere with the Government of the day,” he said.

“There were certain things that were promised by the incoming government but it not only did not do things as promised but reversed many decisions made (by the former Government) when he (Abdullah) was still in the Government.

“I thought this would be carried out during his period in power but new things cropped up and promises were not kept.”

Dr Mahathir said he had not broken any promises after making public his undertakings.

He said he was not campaigning within Umno to unseat Abdullah as “I am not capable of doing that” and “I cannot have him removed”.

“I am not going about campaigning, (but) I would be failing in my duty as an ordinary citizen, as an ex-PM, if I did not direct my attention to issues affecting national interests,” he said.

“I cannot remove the present leadership, I will support the Prime Minister, but I will voice out my opinion if I see something wrong.”

Dr Mahathir said he would continue to stick his neck out to be chopped by opposing decisions made by the Government, as he had done in the past.

Asked to comment on PAS’ suggestion that he be an Opposition Leader, Dr Mahathir said he did not want to have anything to do with PAS as he believed it was not an Islamic party but a deviationist.

“What PAS proposed to do is not practical for the country. Of course, they think they can make use of me, (but) I will not be made use of by anyone,” he said.

“Even when I was thrown out of Umno, I was not disloyal. I never wanted to have anything to do with the opposition, not for emotional reasons, but simply because I don’t think they have anything to offer the country.”

He also said he would not be forming another party and that he was happy being a retired man.

On being Proton advisor, Dr Mahathir said he valued the appointment and that he would not quit, but added that he could be removed if the Government felt he was an obstruction or nuisance.

Related Stories:
Najib stands by Pak Lah
Cabinet rallies behind PM
Group defends Mahathir’s right to air views

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Illegal bookies, loan sharks and VCD pirates team up for World Cup?? YAU MOU GAU....CHOR!!!



PETALING JAYA: Three syndicates – illegal bookies, loan sharks and VCD pirates – have formed an “unholy trinity” to cash in on the World Cup fever with a scheme to lure fans to place bets on matches.

In this alliance, the technology savvy bookies are said to be financed by money coming from the sale of pirated VCDs and DVDs while loan sharks provide financing to desperate punters, charging 3% interest for a 15-day period.

It is a win-win situation for them, said sources, as the punters will end up the losers either way.

“Even if they win, they would have to pay exorbitant amounts in interest to the loan sharks from whom they have borrowed money,” said one source.

However, the police are aware of these activities and have been keeping an eye on the illegal joint venture.

Federal police anti-vice, gaming and secret societies chief Senior Asst Comm II Sidin Abdul Karim said police were aware that bookies have started accepting bets.

In the 2002 World Cup, it was reported that RM3bil in bets were placed with illegal bookies in Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore.

It is also widely believed that the syndicates in these three countries are linked and even accept bets from other countries in the region.

Placing bets with local bookies is not the only avenue. Malaysian punters are now turning to the Internet to gamble with international bookmakers.

It was reported that betting firms such as Betfair and Ladbrokes received close to RM7mil in bets every week from Malaysia during the English football season.

Sources told The Star that the local betting service was being promoted by word of mouth and through runners.

Some loan sharks are even sending out flyers and leaflets advertising their services, complete with the World Cup fixtures.

To avoid detection, bookies were relying on SMS accessibility and assigning a unique code number to each game for punters to SMS their bets.

Besides the usual bet on each game, punters can also bet on the tournament winner (double payout), names of the finalists (250% payout), names of the semi-finalists and finalists in exact order (triple payout), tournament top scorer (600% payout) and the name of the winners and runners-up from five groups in exact order (500% payout).

A runner for a bookie said information on the games, such as odds, handicaps and games' updates, were obtained from the websites of major gaming companies based in Britain, China and Macau.

“These bookies cover practically every sport around the globe, but the World Cup is an especially exciting time because of all the interest it generates among punters. We are using the Asian odds published on the websites as it is less complicated than the British odds system,” said the runner.

For small-timers, the minimum bet accepted by illegal bookies is RM50, while the maximum bet per game is RM300.

“The really big fish simply open an account with the bookie and deposit a sum of money into it,” he added.

Yesterday, Seremban police busted a bookie syndicate with international links operating out of a bungalow in Sikamat.

OCPD Asst Comm Hasanuddin Hasan said three men, aged between 20 and 41, were detained during the pre-dawn raid.

He said police discovered a list of telephone numbers containing clients’ names as well as match schedules.

Friday, June 02, 2006

Landslide that flattened three blocks of longhouses in Kampung Pasir, Ulu Klang?? YAU MOU GAU...CHOR!!



Two women killed, two feared buried

KUALA LUMPUR: Two women were killed and two children were feared buried alive in a landslide that flattened three blocks of longhouses in Kampung Pasir, Ulu Klang here.

A total of 232 people, mostly Indonesians, lived in the longhouses.

The landslide also caused an electrical short circuit that set one of the affected longhouses ablaze in the 4.45pm incident, which happened during a rainfall.

Rescue workers, including firemen, later pulled out the charred remains of two women, identified as Indonesians Hayati Mohd Yunus, 24, and Fatimah Suri, 73.

Hayati's remains were recovered at 9pm and Fatimah about 10.30pm.

At press time, the other two victims – girls aged three and four – had yet to be found. All four are believed to be related.

Welfare Department officials said they had accounted for 228 victims and believed that the missing four were the two dead women and the girls.

Selangor police chief Deputy Comm Datuk Yahya Udin said police were carrying out search and rescue work, together with members of the Special Malaysian Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team (SMART), Fire and Rescue Department personnel, KL City Hall workers and Red Crescent Society volunteers.

Ampang district police chief Asst Comm Azri Ahmad said at the scene that the short circuit was believed to have been triggered by a power pole brought down by the landslide.

He said police were gathering information on the longhouse dwellers to ascertain the actual number of people trapped in the landslide. Police have also cordoned off the area to prevent intrusion by outsiders.

A police spokesman said 16 families living at the nearby Taman Zooview were told to evacuate their homes as a precautionary measure.


More pictures of the Ulu Klang Landslide
Free Website Counters
Free Website Counters © Copyright 2005-2008 SEE FU. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.